If one examines the U.S. map vis a vis gambling, particularly online gambling, and online poker gambling, the view is hardly consistent. Some states, like Nevada and New Jersey, have a long history and a considerable comfort zone when it comes to gambling. Others, especially a number of Southern states, have deep-seated cultural misgivings when it comes to gambling. California, which is one of the few states contemplating gambling bills, jettisoned their attempts at legalization in 2017. Meanwhile, the Midwest remains very insular when it comes to gambling, thereby making expansion attempts an upward battle. In truth, gambling is a better deal for densely populated areas, which may explain why smaller states are less inclined to throw in. Other states are just not financially poised. However, with legal sports betting being potentially around the bend and the need for more revenue streams impacting every state in the union, the map could be changing.
Key Takeaways:
- States in the Southeast that prohibit gambling often do so for inherent and long-standing cultural reasons, or because of political factors.
- With some of the states that evince a reluctance to pursue legal gaming, size can be a factor, since gaming does favor densely populated areas.
- What may eventually tip the balance in favor of legal gaming is the ongoing need for increased revenues in every state of the union.
“The most obvious thing that sets states apart is their regional receptiveness to the industry in general.”
Read more: https://www.onlinepokerreport.com/28515/online-gambling-by-geography/
Add One